Total Pageviews

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Paris Trip

Rachelle and I are currently planning a trip to Paris. I’m not sure when we’ll leave — it depends on how long it takes to make the arrangements. But I expect we’ll be there sometime in August.

This will be our first time visiting Europe. I know… it’s about time!

We’re leaning towards staying at a vegan bed and breakfast in the Champs-Élysées area, which we’ve been told is a nice location if we want to do the touristy stuff.

We intend to be in town for at least a week (probably 10-14 days). We might do some day trips away from the city too.

We may also do a Paris meetup if there are enough people interested in one.

For reasons that probably won’t mean much to anyone else, Paris is #1 on my list of places to explore. Same goes for Rachelle. So we’re putting our energy into making that a reality. There’s no point in diluting our intention by thinking about other places right now.

I’ll visit other places when I desire to do so, but presently I’m ordering up a serving of Paris. Any potential destinations other than Paris have been summarily guillotined.

I just finished a months-long project getting the new workshops scheduled and launched, and I have a window of several weeks before I’ll start prepping for CGW in September and SRW in October, so this is a good time to travel. My next decent travel window isn’t till November.

I’m super pleased with how the new workshops are being received. The initial registrations have been stronger than I’ve ever seen, and my website’s single-day sales record is now double what it was before. Dozens of first timers have been signing up, and there are plenty of returning CGW alumni I recognize as well, so this is creating an awesome mix. Many people signed up for multiple workshops too.

It was a lot of work getting this project completed, and I certainly pushed myself with some long workdays to get everything done. Going from one workshop to four was an ambitious expansion, but I feel good about it, and I’m glad to see that there’s been serious interest in every new workshop. The timing was right, and everything lined up nicely.

I’m really looking forward to delivering these workshops in the months ahead. I’ve been so obsessed with them that I keep having dreams about them — it feels like I’ve experienced each of them several times now. I’m especially looking forward to connecting with so many awesome people. But at the moment, I’m very glad to have the opportunity to switch gears and take some much needed time off.

I’m especially looking forward to reloading some French (got straight-As in French all through high school). I had fun doing that in Montreal last year, but I was only there for 4 days. I was amazed at how quickly it started coming back to me, but the most difficult part was trying to recall so much forgotten vocabulary.

I’m aware that Paris and veganism aren’t the best of buddies, but fortunately there are sites like HappyCow that make it easy to find veg-friendly eats just about anywhere in the world, so I’m sure we’ll manage. I know they have grapes there. :)

Edit: It’s confirmed. We’re flying to Paris on July 28 and staying for 2 weeks.


View the original article here

Jack Canfield - Peak Performance Principles - How to Boost Your Self-Esteem and Discover Your Purpose - Personal Development DVD Training Video

Jack Canfield - Peak Performance Principles - How to Boost Your Self-Esteem and Discover Your Purpose - Personal Development DVD Training VideoBased on Jack Canfield's best selling book The Success Principles, this powerful seminar is loaded with life-changing ideas. Jack will show you how to build your self-esteem, take responsibility for everything that happens, clarify your vision, gain greater balance, find your purpose, and live a more fulfilling life. You'll hear several true stories that will touch your heart and shift your consciousness to an even more positive place. As Jack demonstrates throughout this seminar, success leaves clues. So if you want to reach a new level of success in your life, it takes nothing more than following a proven recipe, and that is exactly what this program delivers. Discover your greatness and take your life to the next level with this exceptional seminar, facilitated by one of the best success speakers in North America.

- BUILD YOUR SELF-ESTEEM HIGHER THAN EVER
- CHANGE YOUR RESPONSES TO CHANGE YOUR OUTCOMES
- TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES
- CREATE A VISION AND FIND YOUR PURPOSE
- CREATE MORE BALANCE & LIVE A MORE FULFILLING LIFE ...

Seminars on DVD producer Michael Jeffreys has created dozens of powerful training videos covering a variety of topics, all delivered by America's top speakers. To find the entire list of available programs, search in the Tags section below for products tagged with the following text: seminarsondvd

Price: $89.95


Click here to buy from Amazon

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Fellows Friday with Viraj Puri

New York restaurants and grocers scramble to get their hands on fresh, local produce. So what could be better than veggies grown right in the city? On a rooftop in Brooklyn, Viraj Puri runs Gotham Greens, a hydroponic greenhouse that cultivates delicious, fresh produce — using a fraction of the water and space needed for conventional agriculture.

Are you a multidisciplinary mold-breaker?
TED2012 Fellowship applications are now open! Apply here.

Interactive Fellows Friday Feature:

Join the conversation by answering Fellows’ weekly questions via Facebook. This week, Viraj asks:

What is most important to you when making your food choices at the grocery store? (Local, organic, free trade, price, pesticide use, etc.)

Starting Saturday, click here to respond!

Tell us about your newest entrepreneurial endeavor, Gotham Greens.

Gotham Greens was created in 2008 with a mission of providing New Yorkers with local, sustainable, premium quality produce year round. We grow everything, from seed to harvest, here in our 15,000 square foot hydroponic rooftop greenhouse.

There are a number of ways to farm responsibly and sustainably. Our methods have been selected based on our unique geographic location. We’re in an urban area with a dearth of arable land. But a largely underused resource that does exist is rooftop space. There are plenty of large, unshaded, unused rooftops in this city that may be well suited to some form of urban agriculture

We’ve selected Controlled Environment Agriculture — a combination of horticultural and engineering techniques — that lends itself well to the built environment.  We grow our crops hydroponically without using soil. Plants don’t require soil, per se.  They require sunlight, oxygen, CO2, water and nutrients. We provide all those things to the plants in the greenhouse, as well as add nutrients to the water, and everything the plant needs comes from that water.

Hydroponics is well suited for a rooftop: you don’t have to haul a lot of dirt up there, or compost, or constantly have to change your soil. And it uses about one-tenth the water of conventional agriculture. Hydroponics is very lightweight and modular.

Hydroponic farming is also very space efficient: our greenhouse can produce about 20 times what you could produce on land in the same amount of space.

Gotham Greens greenhouse facility in Brooklyn, NY.Is it merely space efficiency that accounts for such drastically higher yields?

The space efficiency is a large part of it. But also, Controlled Environment Agriculture, as the name implies, allows us to control the environment in here as much as possible to create the optimal growing conditions for the plants. This allows for very high productivity and efficiency.

We have sensors all over the greenhouse, measuring temperature, light, humidity, CO2, oxygen … different things like that. A central computer control system adjusts the greenhouse based on the readings from the sensors. If it’s too hot, for example, vents and fans are deployed. If it’s too sunny, a shade curtain opens. When it rains the roof vents are instructed to close automatically.

With all this high-tech equipment, and all the energy it requires, is this really an economically viable project?

We believe so. The demand for our produce has been off the charts. Currently our products are available at retail stores in New York City: Whole Foods, D’Agostino, Eataly, and Fresh Direct, and soon at a number of restaurants across the city. We can’t even meet the demand, which is a nice problem to have.

Gotham Greens on store shelves in NYC.

We are dedicated to providing customers with the best quality, freshest produce possible. Our customers are very excited because not only is it fresh, local produce available year round, but it’s also a consistent and reliable yield. We’re largely insulated from extreme weather events, like unseasonably warm or cold temperatures, drought, hail, and frost, as well as pest outbreaks and disease outbreaks.

So we believe there’s a really compelling business opportunity to do this. Even in an unfavorable economic climate, we were able to raise the required capital.

As for energy use, we’ve made considerable effort to be as energy efficient as possible. We’ve sourced the most energy efficient equipment, such as pumps and fans, and we actually rely mostly on natural ventilation for cooling. We installed a solar energy system on the roof –- a 59-kilowatt array –- which feeds a part of the facilities’ electrical needs.

Solar panels share rooftop space with the Gotham Greens greenhouse.

We’ve also selected the most insulating materials one can in a greenhouse application. We have a cover here above our heads, a few feet below the ceiling, which acts as a thermal blanket when it is opened. We’re also going to be installing a radiant water heating system, because it’s a lot more efficient to heat through water than through air. The upfront costs are high, but we believe it’s going to save us energy in the long run.

The greenhouse also should help the host building, energy-wise, because it acts very much like a green roof that helps insulate, so the actual building should theoretically have lower cooling costs in the summer and lower heating costs in the winter.

Part of our investment came from NYSERDA (New York State Energy Research Development Authority) and they gave us money precisely to monitor and collect data to see what is the carbon impact and energy use of our product, compared to conventional methods, with all the embodied energy calculated. That includes the long-distance food transport, and fuel that might have to be used for a tractor, etc., to assess where the energy improvements really are. So part of this project is research and development to see if this is the most energy efficient way to do things.

There are many aspiring social entrepreneurs out there who are trying to take their passion and ideas to the next level. What is one piece of advice you would give to them based on your own experiences and successes? Learn more about how to become a great social entrepreneur from all of the TED Fellows on the Case Foundation’s Social Citizens blog.

Assemble a good team of people, because people have different skill sets. In our case, we wanted to have people with the right technological know-how, people with the right financial know-how, both in terms of raising capital and managing finances and writing a business plan, getting things on paper. Here we’ve tried to assemble a team of people with different skill sets. I think we complement each other and bring different skills to the table.

So if I were to give advice to a social entrepreneur, I would say become a group of social entrepreneurs. Two or three heads are better than one.

You’ve said this form of farming addresses a number of other problems, as well.

A nice thing about farming like this, besides just promoting urban sustainability, is it helps address ecological and public health concerns surrounding conventional agriculture these days, which include everything from food safety — things like E. coli and Salmonella outbreaks — to long-distance food transport and high resource consumption.

Our products are pesticide-free and we eliminate all fertilizer and pesticide runoff, which is the largest cause of global water pollution. As I mentioned, we use about 10 times less water than conventional agriculture. That might seem counter-intuitive, because it’s a water-based form of agriculture, but we recycle that water. We capture the irrigation water, and then reuse it. However, when you’re in a field, the plant takes some of the water up, and then the rest returns to the ground water. Agriculture is responsible for most of the world’s fresh water withdrawal, as well.

We are a triple bottom line approach company. We care deeply about sustainability and the environment, but also about the people in the community. We supply produce each week to City Harvest, which is a large non-profit food rescue group that picks up food and distributes it to homeless shelters and soup kitchens. We employ people from the local community. We’ve created about 25 full-time jobs, so we’re very proud of that.

Eventually, as we expand our production, we hope to also be supplying produce in areas that have limited access to fresh produce. Increasingly we’re seeing that inner city urban areas that have limited access to fresh produce also have very high instances of diet-related illnesses, such as diabetes and obesity. That’s something that we’d like to start to address.

This is a commercial-scale project. It’s not a prototype, but we are starting modestly. We produce about 100 tons a year, which isn’t really that much in a huge city with 8 million people, so we’d like to eventually get to a point where we’re producing a meaningful quantity of food, getting a meaningful number of trucks off the road, and bringing people high-quality, fresh produce year-round. We want to continue increasing jobs in the community, and keeping money in the local economy.

How did you wind up farming on top of buildings in Brooklyn, New York?

My background is, broadly speaking, in the clean technology, renewable energy, and green building space. What I’m passionate about is “appropriate technologies.” That means coming up with infrastructure, technological, and development solutions that are appropriate for a given geographical, environmental, and cultural context. I don’t necessarily think that hydroponic greenhouses are ideal for every city. I do think it’s very well suited to New York City. We have a huge demand for fresh produce here, and very little of it is actually produced here.

In 2004 I helped develop a company that implemented green building and renewable energy installations in Ladakh, India. Ladakh is a high-altitude, remote, mountainous region in the Northwest of India that is extremely rich in solar energy potential. But the region is economically underdeveloped, and there’s not a lot of electricity produced there. Solar electricity systems are a very appropriate technology for that region as they can provide low-cost rural electrification that reduces air pollution and carbon emissions. The idea is to leapfrog from no technology to environmentally friendly technology by cutting out the ecologically damaging steps in between. That’s where I cut my teeth in project management and entrepreneurship in the green building/renewable energy/clean tech space.

I also spent some time in Malawi in East Africa working for a conservation group — again working on appropriate technology -– marketing and promoting fuel-efficient stoves. Malawi has one of the world’s highest deforestation rates, and the largest cause of that deforestation is people foraging in the woods for firewood for cooking. We promoted various fuel-efficient cook stove designs, which use a small fraction of the wood compared to a conventional stove or traditional three-stone fire use. Traditional stoves also created poor indoor air quality. We gathered together some unpatented designs from engineers and development groups around the world, and we trained local masons and metal workers to build these cook stoves. These masons and metal workers in turn sold the stoves in their shops to the community as a commercial product, with the goal of became more sustainable in the community.

Back in New York after a few years abroad, I joined an environmental engineering firm where I had my first exposure to hydroponic greenhouses. I’m not an engineer by academic background — I studied economics, international development and environmental studies. I began to develop a business plan to take hydroponic greenhouses –- a technologically robust and commercially-proven existing technology — and bring it into the urban environment on a commercial scale.

My professional goal is to, one step at a time, deploy creative technological solutions that are appropriate and viable for the geographical location and cultural context of a given region.

There are lots of sustainable, appropriate tech projects you could have undertaken here in New York. Why a hydroponic rooftop garden?

I suppose my interest in food combined with an interest in farming and clean technology. I also recognized that it’s a compelling business opportunity: these are high-value perishable products, there’s an increase in demand for local, sustainably produced food, and people caring about where their food comes from and how it’s produced.

It was recognizing this need, and also wanting to do something that’s never been done before. Our project is fairly innovative, and it seemed like a fun, challenging undertaking. It seemed kind of cool to be the first commercial-scale hydroponic rooftop greenhouse facility in the United States.

Also, I love to eat at nice restaurants. Hopefully if I can become a supplier to the top chefs in the city, they’ll be friendly and invite me to eat at their places. [Laughs]

What’s your favorite vegetable?

Tomatoes, although I guess that’s technically a fruit. I also love butterhead lettuce.

Butterhead lettuce growing in Gotham Greens greenhouse.

Does your produce have any taste, texture, or nutritional difference than conventionally grown produce?

I can’t speak for all hydroponic greenhouse growers but I believe ours may be better. It does tend to be a bit more tender, more delicate — mostly because it’s grown in a controlled environment and not outdoors. It’s not beaten up by the weather, so it’s not as hardy or as tough.

In our system, a lot of the control is on the growers to ensure plant health, flavor and nutrition. Arguably, if the grower’s doing a good job, the plants can actually be more nutritious and tastier than a conventional product, because you’re really coddling these plants providing them with their every need. You’re ensuring they receive the proper nutrition — the right levels of potassium, calcium, magnesium, etc., as well as the right amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, light levels, temperature, and so on.

What’s your grand vision for the project?

Assuming the facility does well, the idea is to definitely build more of them, here in New York City I hesitate to proclaim that this will be the future of farming, or that this will be the way we’re all going to produce food for the rest of our lives. That being said, I believe that this type of farming has a role to play, particularly in dense urban areas. This is the first of its kind facility in the United States.. We’ll see how it does. If it does well, we’ll build more of them. But with a city of eight million people, I don’t think that this is going to be the only form of farming for us.

But the goal is to produce a meaningful amount of food here. I’m not sure what that figure is. Maybe 1,000 tons, 10,000 tons …. Maybe it’s taking 200 trucks off the road each week. That’s 200 less trucks idling in the wholesale market in the Bronx, less congestion, less fossil fuel being used. It also means more job creation, keeping our dollars in the local economy. We already provide 25 jobs. If we could employ 250 people, I think that’s meaningful. Its ambitious, but we’ll take it take it one step at a time.

How has the TED Fellowship helped you along with your goals?

The TED Fellowship was amazing. It exposed me to an amazing group of people at the cutting edge of their fields. It was so inspiring and humbling going to the conference and hanging out with other Fellows from around the world doing really, really interesting work. That was a really impactful thing: being inspired and motivated.

Bookmark and Share

View the original article here

Got Goals? 4 Tips from Real People That Achieved Real Goals

As an alternative to posting the hackneyed advice of self-proclaimed life coaches and storytellers (e.g. Tony Robbins, Tim Ferriss, etc…), I thought I’d collect and share advice from real people in the mySomeday community that achieved real goals.  In the past, they admitted to having issues with finishing what they started.  ”So, what was different this time?”, I asked.  Although they all agreed that building a detailed step-by-step Plan was essential, each had a unique aspect to that Plan that kept them motivated.  Here are their tips.

1.  Break It Down

Maia was determined to get out of credit card debt but was daunted and occasionally paralyzed by the enormity of the goal.  She decided to break down the path into clear, achievable steps and discovered that checking off smaller to-dos generated real momentum.  These small flashes of progress kept her head in the game and allowed her to continue to believe that the goal would someday be reality.  Maia is convinced that taking the time to break down the path into incremental steps made the difference for her.

2.  Picture It

Globehound turned 40 and decided it was time to go back to the future and get back in shape.  To stay motivated, he strategically placed unflattering pictures of himself in various places next to images of people he’d like to emulate.  This ‘in your face’ approach worked wonders.  Whenever he felt lazy or was eyeing that bag of Doritos, he’d take a quick look at the pictures and the urge was squashed.  Now that he’s back in shape, he posted before and after pictures of himself as a constant reminder of a place he does not wish to return.  Globehound was adamant, this visual anchor located in a prominent place had a profound impact on his ability to stick to his plan.

3.  Broadcast It

Christine wanted to change careers.  She knew it for a long time but it wasn’t until she shared this goal with friends and family that she started to make real strides.  Knowing that others were watching and rooting for her proved to be just the motivation she needed to continue to check off steps in her plan.  She used the ‘Share’ option on the  Someday page and broadcast her intentions to her Facebook Wall.  It profoundly affected the accountability factor by adding social pressure and expectations to the mix and Christine says it was just what she needed to make the move from consulting to fashion.

4.  Make It About Something Bigger Than You

A4S4L4 had run a half-marathon before but she was feeling a bit unmotivated this time around.  Someone suggested that she make someone else the beneficiary of her efforts.  She built a plan to run a half-marathon and included a charitable partner.   Knowing that her efforts would do good beyond personal satisfaction gave her a real sense of necessity.   If she was in a rut, she would visit the charity’s website and suddenly her laziness felt insignificant.   She claimed that adding this one element shifted her entire perspective and gave her massive amounts of motivation.

Got any stories or motivational tips?  Please share.  We’re always looking to incorporate new elements into our site to increase the motivation and accountability factors.

Joseph Satto is the founder of social-achievement platform www.mySomeday.com. Part-time lawyer, full-time dreamer. Huffington Post blogger, Jetsetter Correspondent.


View the original article here

Against Neuroethics

The BPS has published a discussion paper on “Neuroethics”. Neuroethics is an unnecessary phrase which covers a hodge-podge of ethical concerns for psychology researchers and broader societal concerns over the application of findings from the cognitive neurosciences.

The paper, prepared by the impressive team of Carl Senior, Patrick Haggard and John Oates, is mostly a discussion of the particular ethical issues that might arise from research using cognitive neuroscience techniques such as fMRI. Overall, it seems to me that all of the substantive ethical issues mentioned by the paper are treated at length by existing moral philosophy (and in particular by medical ethics). It is not clear that psychology and neurosciences have anything to add, which should be a first clue that the idea of “neuroethics” is inherently dubious.

A particularly revealing moment is the authors’ discussion of the evidence showing that people are more likely to believe an explanation when it is presented alongside a picture of a brain scan (McCabe & Castel, 2008 – covered on Mind Hacks here). This, for the authors of the discussion paper, raises the spectre of BPS members having “undue influence” by accompanying their explanations with pictures of brain scans.

In light of the persuasive power of brain scan imagery its use to illustrate any fact should be restricted as much as possible. Brain scan imagery should not be included on recruitment posters for participation in experiments

Here, the authors seem to have been affected by a peculiar version of the very effect they are warning against! They treat influence due to brain imagery as somehow exceptional, in the same way that people in the experiments treat explanations using brain imagery as somehow exceptional. Consider how the argument would look if it was a prescription against accompanying your communications with partcular phrases, or with offers of financial rewards. The way explanations are phrased affects how often they are believed – that does not mean psychologists should not try to be persuasive, nor that they are wrangling the minds of the public in an exceptional way if they are. There is evidence that monetary rewards, like brain imagery, can distort people’s judgement (see, e.g., Hsee, Zhang & Zhang, 2003) – the BPS has not recommended that members can’t pay people to participate in experiments.

It is part of normal cognitive function to be affected by the environment, and there are many quirks about the way we humans are affected by the exact content and structure of the environment. Examples of that influence are not automatically examples of “undue influence”, regardless of whether they involve brain imagery or not.

There are genuine ethical issues which are peculiar to cognitive neuroscience, but our duty to attend to these is better served by seeing brain related issues in the context of general ethics, rather than pandering to the kind of exceptionalism that the phrase “neuroethics” encourages.

A discussion paper: neuroethics and the british psychological society research ethics code

Hsee, C. K., Yu, F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Medium maximization. Journal of Consumer Research, 1–14.

McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343-352. doi:16/j.cognition.2007.07.017


View the original article here

Looking to the Dietary Gods: Eating Well According to the Ancients


(Photo: H.Koppdelaney)

Just a few weeks ago, I received the following from Ryan Holiday:

“…in the last 6 months, I’ve lost 15 lbs and am in the best shape of my life. From adding in sprinting to my running regime, using kettle bells once a week, using a weighted vest while taking long walks, and the cat vomit exercise, I now have abs and — like I said — lost weight in places I didn’t know I was storing fat. It was all from your book and keeping to the slow-carb diet. Here’s the part I really have to thank you for: by changing the way I thought about running, I ran the fastest mile in my life, and that’s after four years of cross country and track in high school. Last Friday, I ran a 4:55 mile. A month before my 24th birthday, I shattered my all time best from track: 5:02. Being that close to breaking five minutes had always haunted me.”

Those of you who’ve read this blog for a while know that Ryan is 23-years old and works directly with Dov Charney as his online strategist for American Apparel. He takes more heat, makes more high-stakes decisions, and takes more risks in a given week than most people experience in any given quarter… and he does so with an unusual calm. Unbeknownst to most, he largely credits this ability to his study of Stoicism, among other practical philosophies.

How did this philosophical bent accelerate his physical changes?…

Ryan made the above progress, in part, because he looked at how to transform choices related to food into a vehicle for larger transformation. If you want incentives to change, losing an additional 10 pounds oftentimes just doesn’t cut it.

So let us look to the ancients.

This guest post from Ryan explores his thinking and features wisdom from Epicurus, Seneca, Epictetus, the Spartans, Montaigne and others.

I’ve been grappling with a dilemma.

It’s a philosophical problem that’s thousands of years old, but fresh in an age of obesity, eating disorders and widespread factory farming: how does eating fit into the so-called “good life”?

What does our diet have to say about our ethics and priorities? The world seems broken down into two camps: those that rarely give the connection a second thought, and those who care too much. Could there be a better way?

And so I sought out the answer in the best way I knew how—by looking to the masters.

A student once asked Epictetus how he ought to eat. This, Epictetus replied, was simple. The right way to eat is the same as the right way to live: be “just, cheerful, equable, temperate, and orderly.” He meant that meals embody the principles and the disposition of the person who eats them. Food means choices and choices mean a chance to fulfill our principles. [So think: being thankful, eating just what you need, tipping generously, caring about where it comes from and how it got there.]

Epictetus was not alone. Philosophers have been experimenting with food for centuries in hopes of finding the best ways to be healthy and to enjoy life. (Seneca, for instance, was once a vegetarian for a year.) They sought to curb the impulse to gluttony just as strongly as they fought the urge to obsess over their weight and appearance. They looked to minimize harm and to live in accordance with nature—just as we wonder about animal cruelty or shop organic today. Ultimately, they understood that everything we do—especially something with life or death implications like diet—is a platform for philosophy, that something you do at least three times a day is worth doing well.

By “well”, do I mean healthy? Or well, as in luxuriously? In fact, I mean both. In this short article, we’ll examine eating “well” through three lenses: ethics, discipline (restraint and release), and health. It’s my hope that you’ll then realize that eating well is not just compatible with the philosophic life, but an integral and essential part of it. And conveniently, it has been baked into the The 4-Hour Body and slow-carb diet lessons.

1) Ethics

The ethics of what we eat is well-trod ground, as vegetarians and vegans constantly point out.

But I think Montaigne expressed the philosophy best when he reminded himself that he not only owed kindness and justice to his fellow man, but to animals capable of receiving the same.

Notice how different this is from most attitudes about food. Justice means doing what is fair and reasoned; kindness means empathy and consideration. Most discussions about diet (from paleo to veganism) are pervasively selfish: ‘But what can I have for dessert?’ ‘Sorry, I don’t consume diary.’ ‘Am I allowed to have this?’ Rarely: ‘is eating this the right thing to do?’ We too quickly condemn what might be best for our health, or conversely assume that the optimal nutrition for us trumps any obligations we have as people. Montaigne reminds us of our real obligations, that we should always try to do what is fair and just—what we can look ourselves in the mirror and be okay with afterward.

It’s a question I faced after reading Jonathan Foer’s wonderful book Eating Animals. I knew vaguely that the horrors of slaughterhouses existed and that I could find hundreds of slaughterhouse abuse videos on YouTube in a second or read the flyers PETA gives out, but I deliberately chose not to. In avoiding them, I made the tacit admission that something was wrong, while refusing to examine that feeling further. There is the story of a Spartan King who met two of his subjects, a youth and the youth’s lover, accidentally in a crowd. Embarrassed, the subjects tried to hide their blushing cheeks, but he noticed and replied, “Son, you ought to keep the company of the sort of people who won’t cause you to change color when observed.”

By eating well, we can be proud and transparent, rather than secretly uncomfortable. For starters, by eating more naturally (protein-dense, appropriate portions), we reduce our footprint—the amount we ask of the world to give us. By caring about the quality of what we ingest, we opt out of brutal factory farming and toxic industrial agriculture—keeping excessive blood off our hands. And by eating locally, we support small businesses and entrepreneurs instead of corporate behemoths who have few qualms about poisoning and fattening us (by doing the same to their “product”) if it means greater profits.

Philosophy gives us the tools to root around within ourselves and find these inconsistencies. We can put them out in the open and resolve them. There is something deeply troubling about a system that drives us to obscure the sources of our food. It asks us to not to think of what we are eating or why. I don’t arrive at the same conclusions as Foer (vegetarianism), but I made a commitment after reading it, to eat the healthiest diet I could, as honorably and justly as was possible. I’m comfortable looking in the mirror after eating meat from farms like Niman Ranch or Good Shepherd Heritage Poultry. (thanks RareCuts.com!) If I don’t have access to these, it means I must go without, which is not a problem because philosophy helps there as well.

2) Discipline (Restraint and Release)

The Stoics avoided pleasure to prepare for adversity. The Epicureans enjoyed pleasure to help get them through adversity. As with most things, the best option for most people is somewhere in between.

Treat yourself to good meals so you don’t covet and crave them (Tim’s cheat days); learn to love simple foods and they’ll become all you need to be happy. And of course, the Cynics practiced a third way: they saw through the whole charade. Food is just dead animals, they said, plants and liquids we’re eventually going to excrete. No need to get excited nor stressed.

Cumulatively, these three schools all realized that it was important to be disciplined and in control of yourself in normal situations, so that you can develop the coping skills to deal with difficult situations. Modern science adds another layer of insight when it shows us that self-control is a finite resource. Subjects who are forced to resist eating fresh-baked cookies, for example, give up on tough math problems more quickly and have trouble sticking with other tasks. This is definitely not the right attitude if you want to be introspective, dedicated and hardworking. So here we have the the real genius of Tim’s “Cheat Days” and the Epicurean concept of enjoying the little things—it’s an outlet for release that makes discipline easier.

Practicing restraint and targeted release is a deeply philosophic exercise. It means being in tune with your body and living naturally. These are two things that are increasingly difficult in a world of plenty. To be able to say “no,” knowing that what may feel good now will actually feel bad later, is to master the self. To be able to reward the self with simple pleasures is to successful navigate the fine line between self-control and self-flagellation.

Cicero wrote that “need is what provides the seasoning for any and every appetite.” He was observing a truism that was old even in his day–that the most enjoyable meals are not the most expensive or exotic, but come at some moment we never expected. After being sick for a long time, at the end of a long hard day or even, perhaps, not even food but a drink when we are incredibly thirsty. Discipline provide a bit extra seasoning we can add to every single thing that we consume. And if could make the notorious Spartan black broth digestible, it can work for us in our comfy nerfy-lives.

3) Health

Of course, eating well and being healthy go hand in hand. But philosophers have stressed this connection for reasons you may not expect.

The right diet is important not because it helps you live longer, they are quick to point out, but because it makes you a better philosopher. Think about what a better person you’d could be if you didn’t fucking hate yourself after gorging your face at a dinner, or feel sick and bloated with gluten, to which you’re allergic. If you felt in control of, and confident about, your body instead of lethargic and dissatisfied. Jumping these dietary hurdles is, in effect, a dress rehearsal for awareness in other areas. How much easier would it then be to be empathic, kind and generous? To focus on other people with energy that’s no longer directed at your own problems?

A healthy man can help others better and longer. Anntonius the Pious, one of the truly great Roman Emperors, kept a simple diet so he could work from dawn to dusk with as few bathroom interruptions as possible—so he could be at the service of the people for longer. And as Seneca wrote to a friend, the better you eat, the less you need to exercise, thus leaving more time for philosophy. Our keen edge, he said, is too often dulled by heavy eating and then wasted further as we drain our life-force in exercise trying to work it off. It’s ironic and sad how many people think they eat well (whole grains, carbs and fruits) but really sentence themselves to needless time at the gym. Imagine what would have come of that time if spent doing good for themselves and others.

We all know that eating healthily is good, but too often we forget why. It is not just about us. It’s about our place in the world and the role we need to fulfill. Like a soldier’s diet, our choices about food help us with the job we must do, and if we waver in our dietary decisions, we may come up empty at a critical moment elsewhere.

An Athenian statesman once attended a dinner party put on by Plato. When he met his host again, he is reported to have said “Plato, your dinners are enjoyable not only when one is eating them, but on the morning after as well.” The man’s point was that he’d felt good the next day too. He was sharp and ready to go instead of a miserable bloated mess. To me, this is a host and a guest understanding the proper role of food, health and pleasure in our lives

Conclusion:

We live incredibly unnatural, stressful lives in increasingly unhealthy times.

The Japanese novelist and runner Haruki Murakami has a theory along the following lines: an unhealthy soul [whether deliberate or from external forces] requires a healthy body. How we treat this bit of flesh we’ve been given says a lot about what we will become on the inside.

Put in a more uplifting light, in such a crazy world, we need to utilize every positive counterweight we can. Eating well is one powerful option.

The benefits aren’t just physical, but also emotional and even existential. Some of the most important moments in my life and career have come at dinners with friends. I think back on these meals, like an Epicurean, and I can savor the the taste all over again. No matter where I am, what I am going through or how long ago it was, I always have this to turn to, to lean on, to enjoy.

By leaning on the masters, who have meditated with this topic for centuries, we find age-old but fresh perspectives. I followed their lead and began thinking philosophically about food–that is, trying to eat both naturally, reasonably and ethically–and I saw drastic changes. I am in the best shape of my life physically and mentally.

And this is why Philosophy is so important. Because it can turn a simple thing like eating into a lens for viewing the world, a path to what we all want: the good life.

###

Interested in philosophy and excellent reading in general? Consider joining Ryan’s free reading list e-mail. It started as a small private e-mail list for friends, but it has now become a book club of about 1,500 people.

If you liked this, I also recommend:
Stoicism 101: A Practical Guide for Entrepreneurs
On The Shortness of Life: An Introduction to Seneca
All posts in “Practical Philosophy”

Posted on July 8th, 2011


View the original article here

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Epilepsy, inside and out

The New York Times has an inspiring piece about neurologist and epilepsy specialist Brien Smith who has just become chairman of the Epilepsy Foundation. Unusually, his interest is more than just professional as he has epilepsy himself.

I was really struck by this part, as it shows how even trained medical professionals can unnecessarily freak out when they see someone having a seizure:

One day during medical school, my classmates and I learned that one of the most well-liked doctors-in-training in the hospital had had a seizure while leading morning work rounds.

The sight of him writhing had caused the other doctors and nurses on the ward to panic. Some stood mute, frozen with fear. An intern, believing that the seizure arose from low blood sugar levels, took his half-eaten jelly doughnut and held it against the mouth of his seizing colleague. Others yelled to the ward secretary to “call a code,” and continued to do so even after another dozen doctors and nurses had already arrived on the floor.

The young doctor eventually recovered. But for many of the medical students and doctors who heard about the episode or were on the wards that day, the dread of that morning would linger long beyond our years of training. Epilepsy was, and remains, a frightening and mysterious malady.

Time and again, I have seen this happen. People call ambulances unnecessarily. People risk the life of the person having a seizure by trying to put something in their mouth (to stop them ‘biting their tongue’). People risk injury to the person by trying to hold them down.

If you want to be one of the few people who don’t freak out when someone has a seizure and if you want to be genuinely helpful, read this brief page on first aid for epilepsy.

And if you have a couple more minutes, check out The New York Times piece on neurologist Brien Smith and his unique insight into the condition. Highly recommended.

Link to NYT piece on Brien Smith (via @mocost).


View the original article here